sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct








UPDATED 11/18/2025 FROM 10/22/2025 FROM 10/21/2025  https://twausa.com/sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct

TAS/USA HAS THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT, IN PART, BECAUSE DEMS LEADER REID AND REPUBS LEADER McCONNELL ELIMINATED TO 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT TO APPROVE FEDERAL JUDGES WHICH  ENABLED REPUBS TO ACHIEVE THE RACIST/NAZIS/FASCIST NIXON/REAGAN/TRUMP GOAL OF ESTABLISHING THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?


SENATE LEADERS DEMS REID’S/REPUBS McCONNELL’S ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT MADE EASIER THE RISE OF THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?  AND REPUBS McCONNELL  ILLEGAL REFUSAL TO VOTE ON DEMS OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF MERRICK GARLAND 8 MONTHS BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTIONS PREVENTED A MORE BALANCE COURT.  BUT McCONNELL’S HIPOCRISY ALLOWED A VOTE FOR TRUMP’S NOMINEE AMY CONEY BARRETT 35 DAYS BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTIONS. 

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”


FOR OVER A HALF CENTURY REPUBS-NIXON-REAGAN-BUSH 1&2-TRUMP CONSPIRED WITH NEO CONFEDERATES AND GERMAN NAZI/RACISTS/FASCIST TO GET A POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT.  SUCH A COURT WOULD BE USED BY THEM TO SUPPORT THEIR AGENDAS OF ANTI GOD/JESUS, COUNTER REVOLUTION, ANTI-CONSTITUTION, ANTI-DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC, WABA/WABIST/WABAISM (WARS/WARRIORS AGAINST BLACK AMERICANS/AFRICANS), AND ANTI GOD/JESUS GIVEN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE.  FULFILLING THAT AGENDA WOULD ALLOW THEM TO ESTABLISH THEIR GERMAN NAZI/RACIST/FASCIST, DICTATORIAL/TYRANNICAL, NEO CONFEDERATE, IMPERIAL EMPIRE. 


The dems/Harry Reid did a very foolish thing by eliminating the 60 vote requirement for the approval of presidential nominees for district and appeals court judges.  The Dems 
Reid foolishness was made worse when Repubs Mitch McConnell retaliated by eliminating the 60 vote requirement for approval of presidents’ sct nominees too.   In the past, the 60 vote requirement forced presidents/dems/repubs to moderate/cooperate/negotiate about their choices to the federal court judges.  Opposition from moderate repubs and dems made it impossible for Nixon to get the 60 votes required to seat his racist nominees on the sct.  The Senate rejected President Richard Nixon’s nomination of Clement Haynsworth Jr., an anti-civil rights/desegregation and anti-labor rights judge, in November 1969, by a 55–45 vote, to the Supreme Court.  The Senate, on April 8, 1970, by a 51–45 vote, rejected President Richard Nixon’s nomination of G. Harrold Carswell, an anti civil rights/previously declared white supremist, to the Supreme Court on April 8, 1970. Nixon came to realize he needed to cooperate/moderate/negotiate with dems/repubs.  So, Nixon nominated a republican, Harry Blackmun, who the senate approved 94-0.  In those cases the 60 vote requirement made it impossible for Nixon to place his racists/neo confederates on the Nixon era sct, who would have played a role in gutting civil rights laws far sooner than the current repubs racist/polar extreme sct judges.

DID SENATE LEADERS DEMS HARRY REID/REPUBS MITCH McCONNELL GIVE UP LONG TERM POWER TO INFLUENCE FUTURE PRESIDENTS’ FROM THE OPPOSITE PARTY/FACTION CHOICES FOR SUPREME COURT NOMINEES BY FOOLISHLY ELIMINATING THE SIXTY VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR SHORT TERM GAINS? 


THE 60 VOTE REQUIREMENT INVITED MODERATION/COOPERATION/NEGOTIATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT PARTIES/FACTIONS.  IT WAS ONE WAY OF SLOWING DOWN/AVOIDING POLAR EXTREMISM/CONFLICT/FIGHTING AND REQUIRING NEGOTIATION/MODERATION/COOPERATION/HARMONY.  THE FOUNDING FATHERS/THEIR SUCCESSORS WISELY INCLUDED SUCH STRUCTURES/PROCEDURES IN  USA’S CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE HARMONY/CHECKS/BALANCE AND TO PREVENRT ONE PARTY TYRANNY.  THE SIXTY VOTE REQUIREMENT IS ONE SUCH STRUCTURE/PROCESS.


SO, YES, SENATE LEADERS DEMS REID’S/REPUBS McCONNELL’S ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT MADE EASIER THE RISE OF THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?  AND REPUBS McCONNELL  ILLEGAL REFUSAL TO VOTE ON DEMS OBAMA’S NOMINATION OF MERRICK GARLAND 8 MONTHS BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTIONS PREVENTED A MORE BALANCE COURT.  BUT McCONNELL ALLOWED A VOTE FOR TRUMP’S NOMINEE AMY CONEY BARRETT 35 DAYS BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTIONS.


CONSEQUENTLY, THE ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT, McCONNELL’S ILLEGAL REFUSAL TO VOTE ON OBAMA’S MERRICK GARLAND’S NOMINATION 8 MONTHS BEFORE THE ELECTIONS, BUT McCONNELL’S HIPOCRISY OF ALLOWING A VOTE ON AMY CONEY BARRETT’S NOMINATION 35 DAYS BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTIONS IS WHY TAS/USA HAS THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

UPDATED 11/18/2025 FROM 10/22/2025 FROM 10/21/2025  https://twausa.com/sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct








UPDATED 10/22/2025 FROM 10/21/2025  https://twausa.com/sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct

WHY DOES TAS/USA HAVE THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?

DID SENATE LEADERS DEMS REID’S/REPUBS McCONNELL’S ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT MAKE EASIER THE RISE OF THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”


FOR OVER A HALF CENTURY REPUBS-NIXON-REAGAN-BUSH 1&2-TRUMP CONSPIRED WITH NEO CONFEDERATES AND GERMAN NAZI/RACISTS/FASCIST TO GET A POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT.  SUCH A COURT WOULD BE USED BY THEM TO SUPPORT THEIR COUNTER REVOLUTIONARY AGENDA OF ANTI-CONSTITUTION, ANTI-DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC, WABA/WABIST/WABAISM (WARS/WARRIORS AGAINST BLACK AMERICANS/AFRICANS), AND ANTI GOD/JESUS GIVEN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS TO THE PEOPLE AGENDA.  FULFILLING THAT AGENDA WOULD ALLOW THEM TO ESTABLISH THEIR GERMAN NAZI/RACIST/FASCIST, DICTATORIAL/TYRANNICAL, NEO CONFEDERATE, IMPERIAL EMPIRE. 


The dems/Harry Reid did a very foolish thing by eliminating the 60 vote requirement for the approval of most presidential nominees.  The foolishness was made worse when Mitch McConnell eliminated the 60 vote requirement for sct nominees approval too.   In the past, the 60 vote requirement forced presidents/dems/repubs to moderate/cooperate/negotiate about their choices to the sct.  Opposition from moderate repubs and dems made it impossible for Nixon to get the 60 votes required to seat his racist nominees on the sct.  The Senate rejected President Richard Nixon’s nomination of Clement Haynsworth Jr., an anti-civil rights/desegregation and anti-labor rights judge, in November 1969, by a 55–45 vote, to the Supreme Court.  The Senate, on April 8, 1970, by a 51–45 vote, rejected President Richard Nixon’s nomination of G. Harrold Carswell, an anti civil rights/previously declared white supremist, to the Supreme Court on April 8, 1970. Nixon came to realize he needed to cooperate/moderate/negotiate with dems/repubs.  So, Nixon nominated a republican, Harry Blackmun, who the senate approved 94-0.  In those cases the 60 vote requirement made it impossible for Nixon to place his racists on the Nixon era sct, who would have played a role in gutting civil rights laws far sooner than the current repubs racist/polar extreme sct judges.

DID SENATE LEADERS DEMS HARRY REID/REPUBS MITCH McCONNELL GIVE UP LONG TERM POWER TO INFLUENCE FUTURE PRESIDENTS’ FROM THE OPPOSITE PARTY/FACTION CHOICES FOR SUPREME COURT NOMINEES BY FOOLISHLY ELIMINATING THE SIXTY VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR SHORT TERM GAINS? 



THE 60 VOTE REQUIREMENT INVITED MODERATION/COOPERATION/NEGOTIATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT PARTIES/FACTIONS.  IT WAS ONE WAY OF AVOIDING POLAR EXTREMISM/CONFLICT/FIGHTING AND REQUIRING NEGOTIATION/MODERATION/COOPERATION/HARMONY.  THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS WISELY INCLUDED SUCH STRUCTURES/PROCEDURES IN  USA’S CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE HARMONY/CHECKS/BALANCE.  THE SIXTY VOTE REQUIREMENT IS ONE SUCH STRUCTURE/PROCESS.


SO, YES, SENATE LEADERS DEMS REID’S/REPUBS McCONNELL’S ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT MADE IT EASIER TO GET A POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?



CONSEQUENTLY, THE ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT IS WHY TAS/USA HAS THE CURRENT POLAR EXTREME, PARTIAL, UNBALANCED SUPREME COURT?

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

UPDATED 10/22/2025 FROM 10/21/2025 https://twausa.com/sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct








10/21/2025  https://twausa.com/https://twausa.com/sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct

DID LEADERS REID’S AND McCONNELL’S ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT FOR SHORT TERM GAINS MAKE EASIER THE RISE OF THE CURRENT PARTIAL, POLAR EXTREMIST SUPREME COURT?

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”


FOR OVER A HALF CENTURY REPUBS-NIXON-REAGAN-BUSH 1&2-TRUMP HAVE CONSPIRED WITH NEO CONFEDERATES AND GERMAN NAZI/RACISTS/FASCIST TO GET A POLAR EXTREMIST SUPREME COURT TO USE TO SUPPORT THEIR COUNTER REVOLUTIONARY AGENDA OF ANTI-CONSTITUTION, ANTI-DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLIC, WABA/WABIST/WABAISM (WARS/WARRIORS AGAINST BLACK AMERICANS/AFRICANS), ANTI GOD/JESUS GIVEN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THEIR IMPERIAL, AUTHORITARIAN EMPIRE OF  DICTATORS/TYRANTS, NEO CONFEDERATES, AND GERMAN NAZI/FASCIST/RACIST.  


The dems/Harry Reid did a very foolish thing by eliminating the 60 vote requirement for the approval of most presidential nominees.  The foolishness was made worse when Mitch McConnell eliminated the 60 vote requirement for sct nominees approval too.   In the past, the 60 vote requirement forced presidents/dems/repubs to moderate/cooperate/negotiate about their choices to the sct.  Opposition from moderate repubs and dems made it impossible for Nixon to get the 60 votes required to seat his racist nominees on the sct.  The Senate rejected President Richard Nixon’s nomination of Clement Haynsworth Jr., an anti-civil rights/desegregation and anti-labor rights judge, in November 1969, by a 55–45 vote, to the Supreme Court.  The Senate, on April 8, 1970, by a 51–45 vote, rejected President Richard Nixon’s nomination of G. Harrold Carswell, an anti civil rights/previously declared white supremist, to the Supreme Court on April 8, 1970. Nixon came to realize he needed to cooperate/moderate/negotiate with dems/repubs.  So, then Nixon nominated a republican, Harry Blackmun, who the senate approved 94-0.  In those cases the 60 vote requirement made it impossible for Nixon to place his racists on the Nixon era sct, who would have played a role in gutting civil rights laws far sooner than the current repubs racist/polar extreme sct judges.

DID/HARRY REID AND MITCH McCONNELL GIVE UP LONG TERM POWER TO INFLUENCE ALL FUTURE PRESIDENTS’ FROM THE OPPOSITE PARTY/FACTION CHOICES FOR SUPREME COURT NOMINEES BY FOOLISHLY ELIMINATING THE SIXTY VOTE REQUIREMENT FOR SHORT TERM GAINS?  THE 60 VOTE REQUIREMENT INVITES MODERATION/COOPERATION/NEGOTIATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT PARTIES/FACTIONS.  IT IS ONE WAY OF AVOIDING POLAR EXTREMISM/CONFLICT/FIGHTING AND REQUIRING COOPERATION.  THE FOUNDING FATHERS AND THEIR SUCCESSORS WISELY INCLUDED SUCH STRUCTURES/PROCEDURES IN  USA’S CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM REQUIRING MODERATION/COOPERATION/NEGOTIATION.  THE SIXTY VOTE REQUIREMENT IS ONE SUCH STRUCTURE.


SO, YES, LEADERS REID’S AND McCONNELL’S ELIMINATION OF THE 60 VOTES REQUIREMENT FOR SHORT TERM GAINS DID MAKE  EASIER THE RISE OF THE CURRENT PARTIAL, POLAR EXTREMIST SUPREME COURT?

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

10/21/2025  https://twausa.com/https://twausa.com/sct-isextremist-becausesenateleaders-reid-mcconnell-removed-60votes-re-quired-toapprove-district-appeal-su-preme-courtjudges-making-it-much-easiertoget-the-current-extremist-sct