-5. a. Tas’, Tas Pats’ Courts, Judges Defending USA’s Democratic Republic Systems, Independence, Sovereignty VS Elite’s Corrupt WIGGA/IGGCA Judges, Courts, Undermining USA’s Democratic Republic Systems, Independence, Sovereignty VS Elite’s Corrupt WCCL Cabal of Trump Judges, Courts, Supporting Trump’s Dictators, Totalitarians, Authoritarians, Minions Attempts to Overthrow USA’s Democratic Republic Systems

Corrupt WIGGA Judges and Courts Stopping Trump’s Overthrow of USA’s Democratic Republic Systems?  VS  A Corrupt WCCL Cabal of Supreme Court Judges Supporting Trump’s Overthrow

This blogger has always believed that the courts will play a critical and perhaps a decisive role:  1.) in determining the fate of the America’s democratic republic systems; 2.)  the survival of its constitutional order and rule of law systems; 3.)  whether Hillary Rodham Clinton will receive her stolen presidency; 4.)  and whether the Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions who are overthrowing and replacing America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems will be successful in replacing it with illegal criminal/dictatorial practices and systems approved by a thoroughly corrupted majority of the Supreme Court.  Our pray to God/Jesus is that we’ll be proven wrong that a majority of the Supreme Court has been thoroughly corrupted.

 

09/19/2019 (Updated From 07/29/2019)

THE COURTS – HONEST BROKERS?  Our pray to God/Jesus is that we’ll be proven wrong that a majority of the Supreme Court has been thoroughly corrupted.  AND THAT THEY ARE NOT JUST A GROUP OF CONSERVATIVE RIGHT WING EXTREMIST AND  IDEOLOGUES WILLING TO RUBBER STAMP A CRIMINAL TRAITOR’S PLANS

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

Today, for decades, the Supreme Court is not a institution which can be trusted to deliver impartial justice and principled decisions for the nation.  It is a tool of two corrupt political parties which reflects the corrupt ideological extremism that’s tearing the country apart.  Somehow, it needs to be reformed and made into an honest, impartial body which renders nonpartisan decisions and solutions for the nation not subject to politically motivated decisions and extremism of WIGGA and WCCL partisans.

That court, on 07/26/2019, granted the Trump administration’s request to stay the California district court’s permanent injunction, under consideration by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, against the use of funds that Congress refused to appropriate to construct a wall.  So, that band of rabid, right wing, conservative, extremist on the Supreme Court pierced Congress’ and the people’s representatives exclusive power to appropriate funds and decide upon there use and allowed, rubber stamped, a Criminal Traitor and his bandits of sycophants and minions to override, misdirect, misuse, and steal the people’s money in ways not approved by Congress or the people’s representatives.  Outrageous!  Another attack upon the Constitution, the democratic republic, and America/Americans by the right/far right extremist and their Trump/Putin&Russia/WCCL War Against America aid by a WCCL Cabal of Conservatives on the USA Supreme Court.

The United States Supreme Court has shown itself to be capable of good and evil.  Its history is one of tremendous benefit and good to the nation and of tremendous harm and evil to the nation.  Three examples of what this blogger considers tremendous benefit and good are the cases of Marbury v. Madison, Brown v. Board of Education, and Youngstown Steel & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, but three examples of what this blogger considers tremendous harm and evil are the cases of Dred Scott v. Sandford, Plessy v. Ferguson. and Korematsu v. United States.  So, today the question is whether the court, as concerns the Trump Administration, is going to do tremendous harm and evil to the nation or tremendous good and benefit to the nation.  It appears to be on a course to do tremendous, great evil, and harm to the nation and its democratic republic.

This blogger believes that history leans towards proving that this current Supreme Court will do tremendous harm and evil to the nation.  In the introduction to this website page the statement was made as to: “4.)  and whether the Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions who are overthrowing and replacing America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems will be successful in replacing it with illegal criminal/dictatorial/authoritarian/fascist practices and systems approved by a thoroughly corrupted majority of the Supreme Court.”  This blogger fears that the answer may be yes!  Trump with the manipulation of Republicans illegally got to appoint one Supreme Court justice which he had no right to appoint – Gorsuch. He appointed another, accused of attempted rape, Kavanaugh, who was so controversial that his nomination divided the nation irreconcilably.  Both of those are right wing ideologues, who routinely render right wing opinions like robots, are as predictable as ideologues in their far right wing conservative extremism as the sun rising and setting every day.

Those two ideologues along with three other conservative right wingers, decided to allow Criminal Traitor Trump, after his declaration of an emergency, to spend money on a border wall which Congress had refused which goes against the principles established in the case of  Youngstown Steel & Tube Co. v. Sawyer where the Supreme Court struck down an order by President Truman seizing that steel mill under claims of an emergency.  The court in that case struck down that seizure under the principle that Congress had specifically considered and rejected such an action, and, therefore, the President had no legal right to seize the company even under claims of an emergency.  But rather than answer the real issues of the case as the lower courts did and follow that precedent, this court of conservative right wing ideologues ignored the true issues and ruled to allow the Criminal Traitor and his sycophants and minions to decide how to spend money that the Congress had denied him the right to spend and which had been appropriated for other use.  Part of its reasoning appears to be a weak argument that the ACLU and others did not have standing to bring suit.  Which is a clever, dishonest, avoidance of the real issue.

THIS IS TRULY AN APPALLING AND SHOCKING DECISION.  FOR THE COURT TO ALLOW IN SUCH A CASUAL MANNER, UNDER THE EXCUSE OF LACK OF STANDING, FOR A CRIMINAL TRAITOR AND HIS MINIONS TO REACH INTO THE PUBLIC TREASURY AND SPEND THE PUBLIC’S MONEY WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF CONGRESS, OF ITS REPRESENTATIVES.  TRULY, IT IS AN OUTRAGE WHICH AMERICANS OUGHT TO BE IN THE STREETS DEMANDING A REVERSAL OF!  IT STRIKES AT THE HEART OF THE PEOPLE’S RIGHT, THROUGH THEIR REPRESENTATIVES, TO CONTROL THE PURSE AND EXPENDITURES OF THEIR GOVERNMENT.  IT LAYS A BASIS FOR THIEVES, CRIMINAL, AND OTHERS TO STEAL THE PUBLIC FUNDS, MISUSE OR MISDIRECT THE PUBLIC’S FUNDS, AND TO MAKE UNAUTHORIZED EXPENDITURES.  AMERICANS SHOULD DEMAND A REVERSAL OF THAT DECISION BY PROTESTS;  REJECT OUTRAGEOUS PARTISAN SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; AND CAMPAIGN AGAINST EXTREMIST, RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGUES, AND THEIR RULING TO MEET FRANKLIN’S RESPONSE AND CHALLENGE, “A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”.

 

06/04/2019

As Argued Yesterday Defy Sullivan’s Order to Coverup/Whitewash Trump/Putin Alignment & Coordination of Policies Amounting to Conspiracy Against USA, But Also Defy Sullivan’s Order to Set Free Flynn and To Promote Themselves as Victims of Unfair, Discredited Investigations by the Investigators, the FBI, the FIS Court, the IC,  and the CIC

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

In a series of blogs on this website on 06/03/2019, the focus was upon: Defiance of Sullivan’s orders as a means of Covering up/Whitewashing Flynn/Kislyak conspiracies  to Align & Coordinate against USA’s Sanction on Russia/Russians for Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Minions.   But in this blog on this website on 06/04/2019, the focus is upon: Defiance of Sullivan’s Order to Set Free Flynn and To Promote Themselves as Victims of Unfair Investigators and Investigations and to discredit the FBI, the FIS Court, the IC (Intelligence Community), and the CIC  (Counter Intelligence Community). Having thus discredited and undermined the integrity and procedural protections in those agencies and in their leaders, they can then staff them with loyal sycophants, criminal groups, and crime underbosses to do the works of tyrants, dictators, fascists,  and authoritarians of murdering, abusing, repressing opponents and citizens.

Those nefarious elites orchestrated defiance in the Michael Flynn case to place Judge Emmet Sullivan in the discredited position of making decisions on how to deal with the problem of open defiance from Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutor’s/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Minions by either reinforcing and justifying further the need to release the information for sentencing, holding them in contempt and jailing them for not complying with orders to release the information, doing nothing, backtracking on his stern lectures to Flynn, dismissing the case, letting Michael Flynn go free, or losing and having his orders overturned and being rebuked on appeal to the appellate or Supreme Court?

The real goals of Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutor’s/Putin&Russia/Republicans is to obviously, deliberately refuse to release the recordings with the aims of discrediting the Trump/Russia Investigators and Investigations, portraying themselves as victims of it and setting free the alleged victim Michael Flynn.  Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutors won’t release the recordings and documents because:  a.) They’re claiming they involve national security.  b.)  They’re claiming the right not to confirm or deny the existence of intelligence information.  c.) They are claiming they referred to open media sources and information to establish Michael Flynn’s lies.   d.) The release of intelligence information is not relevant since they did not need the intelligence information to prove Flynn lied.  So, the goal is not to release recordings transcripts and documents so as to set ground to discredit the Trump/Russia investigators and investigations and prosecutions and to portray themselves as victims and to set Michael Flynn free by overturning his conviction.

By making such claims and by refusing to release recording transcripts and documents, they are undermining the case against Flynn and setting the ground for his conviction to be overturned.  They set up arguments by Flynn’s defense attorney’s for violations of Flynn’s due process rights since information was not publicly released.  Failure to obtain release of the information may also undermine Judge Emmet Sullivan’s previous rebukes, claims of treason, and refusal to follow the special counsel’s prosecutors’ recommended sentence. The consequences could be to  further discredit the whole Mueller Investigation by giving credence to their nefarious plans to portray themselves, including Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Carter Page and other rightly suspected criminal conspirators and traitors as victims of persecution from investigations and investigators by law enforcement, the FIS Court, the FBI, the Intelligence Community, the Counter Intelligence Community, and other protectors and defenders of America.

 

06/03/2019

NOW MORE THAN EVER AMERICA NEEDS HERO JUDGES!

(Update From 12/18/2018)

Federal District Judge Emmet Sullivan A Hero on Flynn Sentencing

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

Like John Sirica in Watergate, Emmet Sullivan can be a hero in saving America’s democracy.  Yes, now more than ever America needs hero judges, as it witnesses a Criminal Traitor having illegitimately seized power try with his minions and underbosses to overthrow its democratic republic and replace it with authoritarian, dictatorial, fascist, tyrannical practices and government.  Last week, the public witnessed the dastardly acts of that Criminal Traitor, his Underboss AG, and his DOJ Minion Prosecutors, defy the orders of a federal Judge, Judge Emmet Sullivan, to release documents to the public.

We need this federal judge to use his considerable powers to directly rebuke, enforce, hold in contempt, and if necessary jail the AG and the Prosecutors for failing to comply with his orders, and accomplish the required release of the documents as he ordered.  This is a grave test of whether or not the rule of law will prevail in America.  America is depending upon the wisdom and resoluteness of Judge Emmet Sullivan to uphold the rules of law.  We’re waiting for his decisions!

From 12/18/2018 blog “Federal District Judge Emmet Sullivan A Hero on Flynn Sentencing”:

• “Judge Emmet Sullivan, today, became a hero in the Trump/Russia Conspiracy case just as Judge John Sirica became a hero in the Nixon Watergate Crimes case.  Just as John Sirica encouraged James W. McCord to cooperate and tell the truth.  Judge Sullivan becomes a hero for refusing, presently, to go along with Mueller’s request for a light Flynn sentence for his crimes.  The Judge stated that Flynn “had sold out his country” and asked “if he [Flynn} could have been charged with treason”.  In blogs below on 12/16/2018 and 10/29/2018 it was written: “But it doesn’t look good for America/Americans as far as bringing criminal conspirators/traitors to justice.” And “Second, is why has Mueller’s investigation requested only light sentences to date,  not charged more American traitors, and given citizens a more complete picture of what he doing and what he’s found?”
• Apparently, Judge Emmet Sullivan has some of the same types of questions for Mueller’s prosecutors and for Flynn.  Judge Sullivan refused to be a rubber stamp for the Mueller prosecutors who asked that Flynn, a traitor in my book, be given a light sentence of 0-6 months in prison.  He questioned Flynn and forced him to acknowledge he’d not been denied any rights from the FBI for which Flynn and his supporter had sought to smear the FBI in the days before the sentencing appearance by arguing that the FBI had not informed him of his rights.  And he asked prosecutors about additional crimes that Flynn was not charged for.  Judge Sullivan apparently did not think Flynn had cooperated enough to deserve a 0-6 month light prison term.  And he persuaded Flynn and his attorneys to go back and rethink their cooperation, and return in ninety days for sentencing.
• This websites blogs have expressed a wait and see attitude, unlike many Americans, towards the Mueller Investigation and has not put Mueller on a pedestal, a position of high esteem, before he’s shown to have earned it in this instance of the Trump/Putin&Russia Investigations.  This website’s blogs have written from the beginning that there is something wrong with the idea that Russia could operate in America and perform the dastardly acts her military intelligence and agents did without America’s intelligence and leaders knowing of it from the very beginning.  That is why this website’s blogs have stated if and when the truth is revealed, Hillary Clinton will claim her rightful place as President of the U.S.!  Perhaps, that will come not through insufficient and insincere investigations, but through the courageous actions of judges like Judge Emmet Sullivan who seek the truth!
• I was listening to a former DOJ attorney, Chuck Rosenberg, on the Rachel Maddow show who stated that Judge Sullivan displayed improper judicial temperament when he questioned and challenged the prosecutors’ decisions to charge or not to charge and to give Flynn a light sentence.  Rosenberg’s argument is flat out wrong.  Judge Sullivan’s temperament, questioning, and challenges were necessary in the search for truth.  Judge Sullivan is part of the judicial branch of government, the prosecutors are part of the executive branch of government, and Judge Sullivan’s job is not to be a rubber stamp for executive branch prosecutors, as Chuck Rosenberg seems to think, but to operate as part of USA’s independent judiciary which settles cases in an impartial and truthful manner.  To defeat the Trump/Putin & Russia conspiracies/war against the USA and to meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”, America will need more hero judges like Judge John Sirica and Judge Emmet Sullivan who’ll seek truth.  Don’t listen to Rosenberg!”

As the public awaits Judge Emmet Sullivan’s rulings on the lawless, illegal defiance of his orders let’s pray to God/Jesus that he’ll exercise the courage and wisdom America needs in these dangerous times to meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A Republic, if you can keep it.”.

 

06/03/2019 (Updated From 06/02/2019)

 JUDGE SULLIVAN’S ROLE IS TO SEEK AND EXPOSE THE TRUTH BEFORE SENTENCING NOT TO SERVE AS A RUBBER STAMP FOR THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

To get to the truth Judge Emmet Sullivan is ordering Trump, Barr, DOJ Prosecutors’ to 1.) release transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak conversations and 2.) to release redacted portions of Mueller’s Report related to Michael Flynn’s criminal case which will help to clearly establish that Flynn was justly prosecuted for lying and why. But Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutors are illegally refusing to obey Judge Sullivan’s order to get out the truth by refusing to release transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak conversations and redacted portions of Mueller’s Report related to Michael Flynn’s criminal case. Because those releases would probably confirm Flynn’s criminal conspiracies with Russia’s Kislyak against the USA, would discredit and prove to be lies attacks and phony claims for rights of retribution upon investigators, FBI, and FISA courts; and would establish the validity of warrants issued against suspected criminal conspirators.  Those are the reasons they are disobeying the judge’s order to release those materials.

On 12/29/2016, in “Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking”, by David E. Sanger, Sanger reports that for Russia’s 2016 election interference Obama ejected 35 suspected Russian intelligence operatives, imposed sanctions on Russia’s G.R.U. (General Intelligence Directorate – military) and its top military officers, closed two Russian land estates (one in New York, one in Maryland), and placed sanctions on 3 Russian companies in Russia involved in election hacking. Russian Ambassador Kislyak and Trump advisor Michael Flynn, later Trump’s National Security Advisor, discussed those sanctions shortly before Trump was inaugurated. Flynn was later convicted for lying about the contents of those conversations. Having been convicted for such lying about the contents of their conversations, Flynn’s case is still pending before Judge Emmet Sullivan for his sentencing.

On 05/31/2019, in “Justice Dept. Keeps Wiretaps Secret in Flynn Case, Rejecting Judge’s Order” (the wiretaps are no longer secret, the public know of them and of some of their content), by Adam Goldman discussion and reporting was made on Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutors’ refusal to comply with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order to 1.) release transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak conversations and 2.) to release redacted portions of Mueller’s Report related to Michael Flynn’s criminal case.

The headline is misleading since the article reports Special Counsel Mueller’s Report and court documents referenced calls between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Kislyak and used exact words from those call documents to prove Flynn lied about the contents of their conversations – conversations in fact concerned Flynn’s requests that Russia delay an escalatory response to Obama’s sanctions on Russia for 2016 election interference amongst other things. Apparently, Russia agreed to coordinate and align on that request. The conversations, in this bloggers mind, is an example of Trump’s Team and Putin’s Team coordinating and aligning their foreign policies. In this case, its safe to argue Team Trump was illegally conspiring against USA’s sanction policies with USA’s enemies, Putin&Russia, since Trump was not president since he’d not yet been inaugurated.

Given the Flynn/Kislyak conversations and Trump’s publicly reported attitudes, the argument is made that Team Flynn/Trump and Team Kislyak/Putin agreed to aligned or coordinated their response to Obama’s sanctions:

• From past news reports it was well known that Trump was doubtful about the use of sanctions and their effectiveness and was not pinned down on whether or not he’d lift them on Russia.   In his report Sanger reported Trump said in regard to those particular Obama election interference sanctions it was time to “move on”.  Later, talk was reported of Trump lifting sanctions on Russia and Congress’ response to it.  Congress began considering bills in the House and the Senate, but Trump/Tillerson came out opposed to any law restricting Trump’s right to lift sanctions on Russia.
• So, the Russia had good reasons to hope he would lift them and to honor Flynn’s request which it did.   Given Flynn/Kislyak’s conversations and requests, given Trump’s dislike of sanctions and a likelihood of him lifting them on Russia, given Trump/Tillerson’s opposition to any legal restrictions by Congress on Trump’s decisions on sanctions, Team Kislyak/Putin&Russia played ball and withheld, as Flynn had requested, an escalatory response to Obama’s sanctions on Russia for election interference.

But nearly seven months later, events had taken severe turns against Team Trump and Team Putin coordinating and aligning policies on the Obama sanctions. On 07/24/2017, the Senate passed by 98-2 the CAATSA (Countering America Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) which had earlier been passed by the House by a vote of 419-3. That Act of Congress imposed new sanctions on Russia, codified into law previous executive orders imposing sanctions on Russia, and required the president to submit to Congress for review any measures lifting sanctions off Russia. With those severe restrictions imposed on Trump and with new sanctions on Russia, the Flynn/Kislyak agreement on Obama election interference sanctions  came to an end.

Putin escalatory and retaliatory responses to Obama’s sanctions sanctions ended coordination and alignment between Team Trump and Team/Putin&Russia coordination and alignment on the issue of Obama election interference sanctions.  On 07/28/2017, on cnbc.com, in “Russia hits back over sanctions, order US diplomats to leave” by reuters, it was reported that the USA had a diplomatic staff in Russia of about 1,100 including Americans and Russians and including 300 USA citizens staffing Moscow operations. Roughly, mirroring Obama’s 2016 sanctions, Putin ordered that the American diplomatic staff in Russia be reduced to the same size as the Russian diplomatic staff in America, 455; the seizure of an American dacha just outside of Moscow; and the seizure of an American warehouse in Moscow.

Judge Sullivan wants the truth out about Michael Flynn’s criminal conduct, why he was prosecuted, why he’s being sentenced, and documentation that will support and justify that sentence. The reason why Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutors failed to compy with Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order to 1.) release transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak conversations and 2.) to release redacted portions of Mueller’s Report related to Michael Flynn’s criminal case is that it will expose an illegal conspiracy by Flynn/Team Trump and Kislyak/Team Putin against the USA to align and coordinate against the USA’s sanctions policies on Russia.

The duty of a sentencing judge is to be fair, honest, impartial, and to seek the truth and not be a rubber stamp. Rubber stamp judges are in authoritarian, brutal, murdering states like Russia and China.  But America has an independent judiciary of integrity. Judge Sullivan must defend that with all his might. So, our prayers to God/Jesus is to grant Judge Sullivan the wisdom, courage, and will to gain compliance with his order from Trump/Barr/DOJ Prosecutors and to expose the truth so as to meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

 

05/29/2019

A Chief Question for Advocates of Truth from Court Proceedings Is: Can and Will the Courts Decertify the 2016 Elections and Restore Hillary Rodham Clinton’s Stolen Presidency?   

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

If necessary, Trump’s election must be decertified or overthrown.  Certain state elections from the 2016 Elections should be decertified starting with the elections in the state of Florida.  Serious questions have been raised as to how many of Florida’s county election systems and data information systems were penetrated by the Russians thereby compromising the integrity of that state’s election results.   It is essential that Americans not just move on to the next elections, but that they rectify the wrong from the 2016 elections in order to reform, strengthen, and restore Americans’ faith in the integrity of their democracy and its elections and to bring wrong doers to justice.

From early on this blogger believed it was impossible that high level officials and politicians did not know that the American elections had been rigged from the very beginning and that they knew and still know exactly when and how it occurred.  That is why on 11/28/2017, in the blog “DEMOCRATS’/REPUBLICANS’ COLLUSION/CONSPIRACY TO CORRUPTLY ALTER/MANIPULATE ELECTIONS FOR TWO PARTY RULE OF THE USA”, wrote:

• Does anyone seriously believe that the Russians walked into the USA, and with the aid of key Republicans, the Republican party, its nominee, Donald Trump, and his aides, helped rig the outcome of the 2016 elections without the USA’s intelligence and key government and political figures knowing what happened from the very beginning?  Is the general public suppose to believe that there are some investigators working furiously to uncover deep plots and that top level politicians and key figures in the parties did not and do not know happened?  It appears so incredible that many will never buy into it as being the real story behind the Trump/Russia investigations.

From recently revealed information from USA’s Florida Senators Nelson and Rubio the public now knows that political figures, key government figures in the FBI, probably FBI counter intelligence operators or officials know about Russian penetration of at least one and possibly two counties in Florida according to those Senators.  On 04/28/2018, on this website, in “The 2016 Election is Not Over – Even At This Late Date – This Blogger Still Believes Hillary Clinton Will Be President of the United States” it was written:

• On 08/08/2018, in the Tampa Bay Times, Steve Bousquet, Alex Leary, and Kerby Wilson, in “Bill Nelson: the Russians have penetrated some Florida voter registration systems”, reported Senator Bill Nelson as saying, “They have already penetrated certain counties in the state and they now have free rein to move about.”;  “That’s classified.”  “County election boards should not be expected to stand alone against a hostile foreign government.”;  “We were requested by the chairman and vice chairman of the Intelligence Committee to let the supervisors of election in Florida know that the Russians are in their records.”; “This is no fooling time and that’s why two senators, bipartisan, reached out to election apparatus of Florida to let them know Russians are in your records and all they have to do, if those election records are not protected, is to start eliminating registered voters.”
• Also, on 04/26/2019, in The New York Times, in “Russian Hackers Were ‘In a Position’ to Alter Florida Voter Rolls, Rubio Confirms”, Frances Robles reported Senator Marco Rubio as saying:  Russian hackers had placed themselves “in a position” to alter data on voter rolls; the Senator said an intrusion occurred but no notice was given to the target[s]; though the hackers were “in a position” to alter voter data rolls they did not do so.  He too like Nelson talked about information being classified.

On 05/10/2018, on this website, in “Could Hillary Clinton Still Become President of the USA?  And Are Americans Inching Closer to Answering that Question Due to Election Fraud and Illegal Conduct” it was written:

• “….Is it possible that there could be some court proceeding to somehow – I don’t know how – to overthrow the results of the 2016 elections due to election fraud, illegal conduct, …?  Case law exists to answer that question … Marks v. Stinson, 19 F.3d 873 (1994)…. Marks did in Marks v. Stinson,….  The circuit court in Marks reasoned that an individual sworn in without proof that he’d won a plurality of the electorate would be a violation of voting rights justifying decertification of that supposed winner.  However, that did not mean that his opponent won.  The but for standard was used.  The opponent won only if he could establish he would have won but for the wrongdoers illegal conduct….”

In our case the proof search for would be did Russia alter the voting role so as to deprive voters of the right to vote and thereby proving that Trump did not win by a plurality since those votes would likely have gone to Hillary Clinton.  Also were their voters whose rights were violated by the Russians manipulation of the voter data rolls.  It is possible that Marks v. Stinson and election laws can for the basis for a challenge to Trump’s win in Florida and other states due to Russia penetration of the voter rolls.

In order to defend Americans rights to vote without undue interference  and unfair activity such as fraud, data manipulation, conspiracy or other illegal acts should a case be brought in the courts of Florida to seek information from the Senators and the FBI on exactly what information they have on illegal conduct, activity, or interference in Florida counties, and should such a lawsuit ask for decertification of Trump’s election based upon such conduct, fraud, and illegal activities in order to defend the American peoples rights to fairly and legally vote and have their votes count and to meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A republic, if you can keep it.”.

 

5/25/2019 (Update from 5/20/2019)

The Struggle to Save America’s Democratic Republic Intensifies Into Court Battles

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

On 5/20/2019 this website blogged on just a few of the cases the courts are now hearing and deciding on in the intensifying struggle between the Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions who are overthrowing and replacing America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems with illegal criminal/dictatorial practices and systems and  the Traditional/Patriotic/Pragmatic/Protectors/Defenders of America who are serving to preserve and strengthen America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems.  So, far district level courts are hearing those cases, and in three of those five cases this website’s blogged about, the courts have ruled against Criminal Traitor Trump.  Those are all temporary  but extremely important victories which Congress and Americans must fight to affirm in the appellate courts and in the  U.S. Supreme Court to ensure the survival of America’s systems of constitutional order and rule of law.

In the Deutsche Bank/Capital One Case and the Mazars USA LLP both district Judge Edgardo Ramo and district Judge Amit Mehta ruled against Trump’s attempts to block Congress’ subpoena’s to third parties having control of financial records of Trump.  Deutsche Bank and Capital One had control of Trump’s financial records in his bank dealings with them and Mazars had control of Trump’s financial accounting records in their accounting services for him.  The judges found Congress had the power to investigate pursuant with its legislative power and that a presumption existed that Congress was exercising its investigation powers for legislative purpose. And precedent established as long as 160 years ago confirmed that power of Congress.  And Congress subpoenas issued in pursuit of investigations are valid for legislative purposes.  Accordingly, the courts found no merit in the plaintiffs argument and found Congress’ subpoenas valid and enforceable.

Trump attempted to spend $6.7 billion on border wall construction  which Congress had declined to appropriate by issuing a phony emergency declaration which he claims allowed to him go around Congress’ refusal to appropriate. He’d asked for $8 billion, but Congress appropriated $1.375 billion.  Under his emergency declaration, he decided to take additional funds to equal his $8 billion request!!!  He’s a corrupt wannabe dictator!!!  He took $2.5 billion from military counter drug activity funds, $3.6 billion from military construction funds, and $600 million from the Treasury Asset Forfeiture Funds.  – dictator!!!   In the Trump Spends Unappropriated Funds on Wall case,  Sierra Club et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al, Judge Haywood Gilliam, on 05/24/2019, issued a temporary injunction against Trump’s plan to spend that money on wall construction which Congress had declined to approve. The judge relying upon the principle of separation of powers – cited Congress’ power to appropriate; the president doesn’t have that power.

If the courts don’t step in and help Americans stop this greedy, corrupt, Criminal Traitor, Americans will face a greater struggle to fight for their democracy, freedoms, civil liberties, and civil rights from this Monstrous Criminal Traitor.  The lower level courts so far have performed well, but Americans do not know how the U.S. Supreme Court will rule – it could very well support his monstrous power grabs.  Its been illegitimately stacked with at least one illegitimate justice, Gorsuch, who has no right to his seat since that appointment belonged to Obama but was denied him by a Republican Senate.  So, Americans be wary of what the Supreme Court might do to make your struggle more difficult.  But for now be heartened by what the lower courts are doing to stop Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions from overthrowing and replacing America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems with illegal criminal/dictatorial practices and systems and to  meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A republic, if you can keep it.”.

 

05/20/2019

The Struggle to Save America’s Democratic Republic Intensifies Into Court Battles

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

In the early weeks of May 2019 the Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions who are overthrowing and replacing America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems with illegal criminal/dictatorial practices and systems  intensified their fights with the Traditional/Patriotic/Pragmatic/Protectors/Defenders of America who are serving to preserve and strengthen America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems.  As a result, those opponents have increasingly called upon the courts to settle disputes and  make decisions.   The courts have allowed some cases to linger on for months or years, slowly dealt with other cases, and decided issues in a few cases concerning the Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions who are overthrowing and replacing America’s democratic republic and rule of law practices and systems with illegal criminal/dictatorial practices and systems.

In the early weeks of May 2019, several courts as a result of that intensified struggle, began hearing more cases and  making more decisions effecting the Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions efforts to overthrow and replace America’s democratic republic systems with Trump/Putin&Russia/criminal/dictatorial/fascist/despotic/Neo Nazi type practices and systems. Some of the cases were the:

• Deutsche Bank/Capital One Case: On 05/03/2019 U.S. District of Manhattan, New York Judge Edgardo Ramo granted the U.S. House of Representatives the right to intervene in a case filed by Donald Trump to prevent Deutsche Bank and Capital One Financial Corporation from obeying subpoenas, respectively, from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Financial Services Committee to turn over Trump’s financial documents to them.  The U.S. House is intervening to have the court enforce its subpoenas to those banks. Trump’s claiming the subpoenas are designed to discover embarrassing information about him but Congress is claiming it needs the information for oversight legislative purposes.  The Judge may rule on May 22, 2019.
• Roger Stone Case: On 05/09/2019 U.S. District of Columbia  Judge Amy Berman ordered prosecutors in that case to turn over to her unredacted sections of the Mueller Report relating to Donald Trump’s former adviser Roger Stone’s case.  The Judge will review the documents and decide what materials Stone’s entitle to in his trial on obstruction of an official proceeding, making false statements, and witness tampering.
• Mazars USA LLP:  On 05/12/2019 U.S. District of Columbia Judge Amit Mehta heard the Mazar USA LLP case where Donald Trump filed suit to block that accounting firm from obeying the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on Oversight and Reform’s subpoena to that firm to turn over to it Trump’s financial records.  Trump’s arguing that the committee’s subpoena for his financial records is not based on a legitimate legislative function.  Congress is arguing its oversight and investigative functions entitles it to that information under law.  The judge kept the record open till May 18, 2019 and he stated he’d make a prompt ruling shortly thereafter.
• Michael Flynn Case:  On 05/16/2019 U.S. District of Columbia Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered prosecutors to unredact portions of the Mueller report concerning criminal defendant Michael Flynn and to release it to the public on the court’s website by May 31, 2019.  He ordered that the prosecutors release include Michael Flynn’s conversation with the Russian ambassador in November 2016 which Flynn tried to hide.  And he also ordered that the prosecutors release to the public a transcript of a call by Trump’s lawyer to Michael Flynn regarding his cooperation with the special counsel prosecutors.
• Trump Spends Unappropriated Funds on Wall case: On 05/17/2019 U.S. District of Oakland, California Judge Haywood Gilliam heard the ACLU argue the Sierra Club case that an injunction should be issued prohibiting Donald Trump from spending more money ($6 billion) on a border wall than Congress had appropriated for ($1.375 billion).  The U.S. House of Representatives’ lawyer, appearing as friend of the court) argued such spending was unconstitutional, and the ACLU lawyers  argued that Trump’s spending exceeded Congress’ authorization as well as violated its limitations regarding locations, scope, and speed requirements of such authorized spending.

The courts are one area, only one, but a critical and decisive one, where Americans must ask their Traditional/Patriotic/Pragmatic/Protectors/Defenders to render eternal, vigorous, sustained, multigenerational service to defend and preserve their freedoms, democracy, decency, and human dignity expressed in their constitutional systems of democrat republic and rule of law, and in their documents and in their history.

Such eternal, vigorous, sustained, multigenerational service in the courts is needed to defend and protect Americans from Trump’s Trump/Putin&Russia/Republicans/Traitorous Minions; from Trump’s Putin&Russia/WCCL 2016 election crimes and conspiracies; from Trump’s financial crimes; from Trump’s Minions’ lawlessness/disobedience/violations of laws; from claims against indicting Trump for crimes/unchecked despotic abuse of powers; from Trump’s contempt and violations of Congress’ authority; and from Trump’s execution of commissions to wreck and sow confusion in America’s foreign and domestic spheres.  From such eternal, sustained, vigorous, multigenerational service to defend and protect Americans systems of freedom, democracy, decency, and humanity, Americans will meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A republic, if you can keep it.”.

 

12/19/2018

At Flynn’s Sentencing Judge Sullivan Asked the Prosecutors If Flynn Could Have Been Charged with Treason:  MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Said No, A CNN Guest/Analyst Said No – It Was Ridiculous, But This Blogger Says Yes, and That Should Have Been the Answer Long Ago!

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

In a blog below, the blogger elevated Judge Emmet Sullivan to the status of a hero in the likeness of Watergate’s Judge John Sirica for not going along with Mueller’s prosecutors’ request to give Traitor Flynn a light sentence of 0-6 months and for asking Mueller’s prosecutors if they could have charged Flynn with treason.  From the MSNBC Rachel Madow show, this blogger rejected former DOJ attorney Chuck Rosenberg’s claim that by pursuing such questions Judge Sullivan was exercising improper judicial temperament and intruding upon prosecutors prerogatives.  To the contrary, Judge Sullivan was wisely exercising judicial authority in requiring Flynn and the prosecutors to defend and explain why Flynn, who’d betrayed his country and committed other crimes, deserved a minor sentence.  In the end the Judge refused to be a rubber stamp for the prosecutors or Flynn and convinced them to go away and to try again in 90 days.

But the prosecutors answered no to Judge Sullivan’s question of whether they could have charged Flynn with treason.  Later, in a discussion on the question, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell said No as well.  O’Donnell’s reasoning was that treason could only be charged as a wartime crime where the person during a declared war had given aid and comfort to the enemy in that declared war.  And since the USA had not declared war on Russia and Russia was not an enemy in such a declared war Flynn could not be charged with treason.  So, O’Donnell reasoned at best Flynn was guilty of betraying the USA.  O’Donnell’s reasoning is fallacious and if it is supported by precedent the precedent aught to be challenged in a court of law to be overturned.

It is a fallacy that countries can be at war and be wartime enemies only when they declare war.  We’ve seen an instance of such an undeclared war by an enemy in Ukraine where Russia stealthily invaded Ukraine, then seized control of Ukraine’s Crimea, and later annexed it to Russia.  Russia continued its war against Ukraine by stealthily instigating and supporting an insurgency in Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region to seize and control it.  Today, stealthily, Russia continues to send troops and weapons into Donbas, and stealthily it continues to support and arm insurgents within Donbas to maintain control over it.  So, its is a war time enemy of Ukraine,  having stealthily seized and annex Crimea, and, presently, supporting, arming, and controlling Ukraine’s Donbas and its insurgents war on Ukraine even though it has not officially declared war against Ukraine.

Make no mistake about it!  America is at war with Russia! Russia has stealthily declared and is stealthily waging a War Against America.  Evidence exists that Flynn conspired with Russia, a war time enemy of the USA, and through such conspiracies gave aid and comfort to Russia –  making the answer to Judge Emmet Sullivan’s question, Yes, Flynn could have been charged with treason.  Russia has chosen to stealthily start a War Against America and American traitors have joined her to give aid and comfort to Russia.  Don’t buy O’Donnell’s answer!  Answer Judge Sullivan’s question with a resounding Yes!  To save America and the world, America/Americans must wake up and defend herself against Putin&Russia to defeat, destroy, and dismantle the monstrous menace, the Russian Federation, so as to stop its attacks and attempts to destroy the USA, and, thereby, meet Franklin’s response and Challenge:  “A Republic, if you can keep it.”.

 

12/18/2018

Federal District Judge Emmet Sullivan A Hero on Flynn Sentencing

“A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”

Judge Emmet Sullivan, today, became a hero in the Trump/Russia Conspiracy case just as Judge John Sirica became a hero in the Nixon Watergate Crimes case.  Just as John Sirica encouraged James W. McCord to cooperate and tell the truth.  Judge Sullivan becomes a hero for refusing, presently, to go along with Mueller’s request for a light Flynn sentence for his crimes.  The Judge stated that Flynn “had sold out his country” and asked “if he [Flynn} could have been charged with treason”.  In blogs below on 12/16/2018 and 10/29/2018 it was written: “But it doesn’t look good for America/Americans as far as bringing criminal conspirators/traitors to justice.” And “Second, is why has Mueller’s investigation requested only light sentences to date,  not charged more American traitors, and given citizens a more complete picture of what he doing and what he’s found?”

Apparently, Judge Emmet Sullivan has some of the same types of questions for Mueller’s prosecutors and for Flynn.  Judge Sullivan refused to be a rubber stamp for the Mueller prosecutors who asked that Flynn, a traitor in my book, be given a light sentence of 0-6 months in prison.  He questioned Flynn and forced him to acknowledge he’d not been denied any rights from the FBI for which Flynn and his supporter had sought to smear the FBI in the days before the sentencing appearance by arguing that the FBI had not informed him of his rights.  And he asked prosecutors about additional crimes that Flynn was not charged for.  Judge Sullivan apparently did not think Flynn had cooperated enough to deserve a 0-6 month light prison term.  And he persuaded Flynn and his attorneys to go back and rethink their cooperation, and return in ninety days for sentencing.

This websites blogs have expressed a wait and see attitude, unlike many Americans, towards the Mueller Investigation and has not put Mueller on a pedestal, a position of high esteem, before he’s shown to have earned it in this instance of the Trump/Putin&Russia Investigations.  This website’s blogs have written from the beginning that there is something wrong with the idea that Russia could operate in America and perform the dastardly acts her military intelligence and agents did without America’s intelligence and leaders knowing of it from the very beginning.  That is why this website’s blogs have stated if and when the truth is revealed, Hillary Clinton will claim her rightful place as President of the U.S.!  Perhaps, that will come not through insufficient and insincere investigations, but through the courageous actions of judges like Judge Emmet Sullivan who seek the truth!

I was listening to a former DOJ attorney, Chuck Rosenberg, on the Rachel Maddow show who stated that Judge Sullivan displayed improper judicial temperament when he questioned and challenged the prosecutors’ decisions to charge or not to charge and to give Flynn a light sentence.  Rosenberg’s argument is flat out wrong.  Judge Sullivan’s temperament, questioning, and challenges were necessary in the search for truth.  Judge Sullivan is part of the judicial branch of government, the prosecutors are part of the executive branch of government, and Judge Sullivan’s job is not to be a rubber stamp for executive branch prosecutors, as Chuck Rosenberg seems to think, but to operate as part of USA’s independent judiciary which settles cases in an impartial and truthful manner.  To defeat the Trump/Putin & Russia conspiracies/war against the USA and to meet Franklin’s response and challenge, “A REPUBLIC, IF YOU CAN KEEP IT.”, America will need more hero judges like Judge John Sirica and Judge Emmet Sullivan who’ll seek truth.  Don’t listen to Rosenberg!