6.e. THE WAR: BECAUSE WIGGA/IGG CA GLOBALIST ELITE TOTALITARIAN -DICTATOR DEMOCRATS AND WCCL GLOBALIST ELITE RUSSIFIED AUTHO RITARIAN-AUTOCRATIC REPUBLICAN S ATTACK SOCIAL MEDIA 1ST AMEND MENT FREE SPEECH RIGHTS JUST LI KE AUTHORITARIANS, TOTALITARIA ANS RESPECTIVELY IN RUSSIA AND IN CHINA, SHOULD TAS PAT, USA, TA S, AMERICANS REJECT THEM BOTH? ————————————- TAS PATS, USA, TAS, AMERICANS RE JECT DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS RESPECTIVE TOTALITARIAN CCP’S XI JINPING-CHINA STYLE OR AUTHORIT ARIAN KGB’S/FSB ‘S PUTIN-RUSSIA STYLE OPPRESSION/REPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA TFORMS AS INCONSISTENT WITH TA S’ 1ST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS A ND GUARANTEES OF FREE SPEECH. ————————————-THEY REJECT BOTH GLOBALIST ELIT E BIG BROTHER DEMOCRAT GOVERN MENT ELITISTS, STATISTS, CENTRAL PLANNERS, SOCIALISTS OR GLOBALI ST ELITE BIG BROTHER REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT, ELITISTS, STATIST, A UTOCRATIC BOSSES, FASCIST, OLIGA RCHS, MINIONS/SYCOPHANTS PASSI NG LAWS LIMITING, MICRO-CONTRO LLING /MICROMANAGING PEOPLE’S FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA TFORMS. THEY REJECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS, TAS PATS, USA, AMERICANS REJ ECT DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS A TTEMPT TO PASS LAWS EMPOWERIN G MULTINATIONAL CORPORATE BUR EAUCRATIC ELITES LIKE FEUDAL/PL ANTATION LORDS AND SLAVE OWNE RS TO CENSOR AND OTHERWISE LIM IT AND DENY INDIVIDUALS PROTECT ED FREE SPEECH RIGHTS ON CORPO ATE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. REJ ECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS PATS, TAS, USA, AMERICANS OP POSE THE USE OF BIG BROTHER DEM OCRATS AND BIG BROTHER REPUBLI CANS THREAT TO IMPOSE LIABILITY ON CORPORATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL S/GROUPS SPEECH UNLESS CORPORA TIONS AGREE TO LAW STIFLING FRE E SPEECH AND EXPRESSION AND MA NDATING COPORATIONS’ USE BUREA UCRATIC ELITE QUASI-GOVERNMEN T CENSORS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA PLAT FORMS. REJECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS PATS, AMERICANS, TAS, USA OPPOSE DEMOCRATS’ TOTALITARIAN CCP’S XI JING PING-CHINA 1984 STYL E BIG BROTHER AND REPUBLICANS A UTHORITARIAN KGB ‘S/FSB’S PUTIN-RUSSIA 1984 STYLE BIG BROTHER MI CRO-CONTROLLING, MICROMANAGI NG OF PEOPLES’ FREE SPEECH ON SO CIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS THRU GOVE RNMENT LAWS AND MANDATED USE OF COPORATE QUASI-GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC CENSORS UNDER TH REATS OF CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR INDIVIDUALS/GROUPS EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA T FORMS. ————————————-YES, REJECT THEM BOTH, SINCE TAS PATS, USA, TAS, AMERICANS WANT N O PART OF THEIR MULTINATIONAL C ORPORATE, QUASI-GOVERNMENT BU REAUCRATIC, FEUDAL/PLANTATION LORDS AND SLAVE OWNERS TYPE CE NSORS WHO LIMIT AND DENY INDIV IDUALS PROTECTED FREE SPEECH RI GHTS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. SO, REJECT THEM BOT H TO MEET FRANKLIN’S RESPONSE A ND CHALLENGE, “A REPUBLIC, IF YO U CAN KEEP IT.” – Commentator: The World and United States of America

6.e. THE WAR: BECAUSE WIGGA/IGG CA GLOBALIST ELITE TOTALITARIAN -DICTATOR DEMOCRATS AND WCCL GLOBALIST ELITE RUSSIFIED AUTHO RITARIAN-AUTOCRATIC REPUBLICAN S ATTACK SOCIAL MEDIA 1ST AMEND MENT FREE SPEECH RIGHTS JUST LI KE AUTHORITARIANS, TOTALITARIA ANS RESPECTIVELY IN RUSSIA AND IN CHINA, SHOULD TAS PAT, USA, TA S, AMERICANS REJECT THEM BOTH? ————————————- TAS PATS, USA, TAS, AMERICANS RE JECT DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS RESPECTIVE TOTALITARIAN CCP’S XI JINPING-CHINA STYLE OR AUTHORIT ARIAN KGB’S/FSB ‘S PUTIN-RUSSIA STYLE OPPRESSION/REPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA TFORMS AS INCONSISTENT WITH TA S’ 1ST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS A ND GUARANTEES OF FREE SPEECH. ————————————-THEY REJECT BOTH GLOBALIST ELIT E BIG BROTHER DEMOCRAT GOVERN MENT ELITISTS, STATISTS, CENTRAL PLANNERS, SOCIALISTS OR GLOBALI ST ELITE BIG BROTHER REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT, ELITISTS, STATIST, A UTOCRATIC BOSSES, FASCIST, OLIGA RCHS, MINIONS/SYCOPHANTS PASSI NG LAWS LIMITING, MICRO-CONTRO LLING /MICROMANAGING PEOPLE’S FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA TFORMS. THEY REJECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS, TAS PATS, USA, AMERICANS REJ ECT DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS A TTEMPT TO PASS LAWS EMPOWERIN G MULTINATIONAL CORPORATE BUR EAUCRATIC ELITES LIKE FEUDAL/PL ANTATION LORDS AND SLAVE OWNE RS TO CENSOR AND OTHERWISE LIM IT AND DENY INDIVIDUALS PROTECT ED FREE SPEECH RIGHTS ON CORPO ATE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. REJ ECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS PATS, TAS, USA, AMERICANS OP POSE THE USE OF BIG BROTHER DEM OCRATS AND BIG BROTHER REPUBLI CANS THREAT TO IMPOSE LIABILITY ON CORPORATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL S/GROUPS SPEECH UNLESS CORPORA TIONS AGREE TO LAW STIFLING FRE E SPEECH AND EXPRESSION AND MA NDATING COPORATIONS’ USE BUREA UCRATIC ELITE QUASI-GOVERNMEN T CENSORS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA PLAT FORMS. REJECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS PATS, AMERICANS, TAS, USA OPPOSE DEMOCRATS’ TOTALITARIAN CCP’S XI JING PING-CHINA 1984 STYL E BIG BROTHER AND REPUBLICANS A UTHORITARIAN KGB ‘S/FSB’S PUTIN-RUSSIA 1984 STYLE BIG BROTHER MI CRO-CONTROLLING, MICROMANAGI NG OF PEOPLES’ FREE SPEECH ON SO CIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS THRU GOVE RNMENT LAWS AND MANDATED USE OF COPORATE QUASI-GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC CENSORS UNDER TH REATS OF CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR INDIVIDUALS/GROUPS EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA T FORMS. ————————————-YES, REJECT THEM BOTH, SINCE TAS PATS, USA, TAS, AMERICANS WANT N O PART OF THEIR MULTINATIONAL C ORPORATE, QUASI-GOVERNMENT BU REAUCRATIC, FEUDAL/PLANTATION LORDS AND SLAVE OWNERS TYPE CE NSORS WHO LIMIT AND DENY INDIV IDUALS PROTECTED FREE SPEECH RI GHTS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. SO, REJECT THEM BOT H TO MEET FRANKLIN’S RESPONSE A ND CHALLENGE, “A REPUBLIC, IF YO U CAN KEEP IT.”

6.e. THE WAR: BECAUSE WIGGA/IGG CA GLOBALIST ELITE TOTALITARIAN -DICTATOR DEMOCRATS AND WCCL GLOBALIST ELITE RUSSIFIED AUTHO RITARIAN-AUTOCRATIC REPUBLICAN S ATTACK SOCIAL MEDIA 1ST AMEND MENT FREE SPEECH RIGHTS JUST LI KE AUTHORITARIANS, TOTALITARIA ANS RESPECTIVELY IN RUSSIA AND IN CHINA, SHOULD TAS PAT, USA, TA S, AMERICANS REJECT THEM BOTH? ————————————- TAS PATS, USA, … Continue reading 6.e. THE WAR: BECAUSE WIGGA/IGG CA GLOBALIST ELITE TOTALITARIAN -DICTATOR DEMOCRATS AND WCCL GLOBALIST ELITE RUSSIFIED AUTHO RITARIAN-AUTOCRATIC REPUBLICAN S ATTACK SOCIAL MEDIA 1ST AMEND MENT FREE SPEECH RIGHTS JUST LI KE AUTHORITARIANS, TOTALITARIA ANS RESPECTIVELY IN RUSSIA AND IN CHINA, SHOULD TAS PAT, USA, TA S, AMERICANS REJECT THEM BOTH? ————————————- TAS PATS, USA, TAS, AMERICANS RE JECT DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS RESPECTIVE TOTALITARIAN CCP’S XI JINPING-CHINA STYLE OR AUTHORIT ARIAN KGB’S/FSB ‘S PUTIN-RUSSIA STYLE OPPRESSION/REPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA TFORMS AS INCONSISTENT WITH TA S’ 1ST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS A ND GUARANTEES OF FREE SPEECH. ————————————-THEY REJECT BOTH GLOBALIST ELIT E BIG BROTHER DEMOCRAT GOVERN MENT ELITISTS, STATISTS, CENTRAL PLANNERS, SOCIALISTS OR GLOBALI ST ELITE BIG BROTHER REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT, ELITISTS, STATIST, A UTOCRATIC BOSSES, FASCIST, OLIGA RCHS, MINIONS/SYCOPHANTS PASSI NG LAWS LIMITING, MICRO-CONTRO LLING /MICROMANAGING PEOPLE’S FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA TFORMS. THEY REJECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS, TAS PATS, USA, AMERICANS REJ ECT DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS A TTEMPT TO PASS LAWS EMPOWERIN G MULTINATIONAL CORPORATE BUR EAUCRATIC ELITES LIKE FEUDAL/PL ANTATION LORDS AND SLAVE OWNE RS TO CENSOR AND OTHERWISE LIM IT AND DENY INDIVIDUALS PROTECT ED FREE SPEECH RIGHTS ON CORPO ATE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. REJ ECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS PATS, TAS, USA, AMERICANS OP POSE THE USE OF BIG BROTHER DEM OCRATS AND BIG BROTHER REPUBLI CANS THREAT TO IMPOSE LIABILITY ON CORPORATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL S/GROUPS SPEECH UNLESS CORPORA TIONS AGREE TO LAW STIFLING FRE E SPEECH AND EXPRESSION AND MA NDATING COPORATIONS’ USE BUREA UCRATIC ELITE QUASI-GOVERNMEN T CENSORS FOR SOCIAL MEDIA PLAT FORMS. REJECT THEM BOTH. ————————————-TAS PATS, AMERICANS, TAS, USA OPPOSE DEMOCRATS’ TOTALITARIAN CCP’S XI JING PING-CHINA 1984 STYL E BIG BROTHER AND REPUBLICANS A UTHORITARIAN KGB ‘S/FSB’S PUTIN-RUSSIA 1984 STYLE BIG BROTHER MI CRO-CONTROLLING, MICROMANAGI NG OF PEOPLES’ FREE SPEECH ON SO CIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS THRU GOVE RNMENT LAWS AND MANDATED USE OF COPORATE QUASI-GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC CENSORS UNDER TH REATS OF CORPORATE LIABILITY FOR INDIVIDUALS/GROUPS EXERCISE OF FREE SPEECH ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLA T FORMS. ————————————-YES, REJECT THEM BOTH, SINCE TAS PATS, USA, TAS, AMERICANS WANT N O PART OF THEIR MULTINATIONAL C ORPORATE, QUASI-GOVERNMENT BU REAUCRATIC, FEUDAL/PLANTATION LORDS AND SLAVE OWNERS TYPE CE NSORS WHO LIMIT AND DENY INDIV IDUALS PROTECTED FREE SPEECH RI GHTS ON CORPORATE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS. SO, REJECT THEM BOT H TO MEET FRANKLIN’S RESPONSE A ND CHALLENGE, “A REPUBLIC, IF YO U CAN KEEP IT.”